One of the main sticking points here is the use of new media technologies (ie the internets) and the royalties that come along with them. The Writers Guild is holding out so their members get more of a share of the profits when television programs and movies are distributed online (through programs such as iTunes). The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers contend that the distribution channels are still too new to determine how much profit they pull in and therefore can't really negotiate with that in mind.
While many probably don't think this is too significant (aside from those who like me who fret the thought of even more reality programing on television) here's why it is. For one, it'll determine who profits and in what ways from programs distributed on the internet. That could have an effect of how television shows and movies are downloaded and flooded to the internet (through channels like YouTube) and how much they cost consumers. The other item of importance is, as described by Scott Collins of the LA Times (although he rejects the idea), is whether a prolonged strike will drive up viewership of online only and user-constructed programming.
In terms of programming, this will effect you, the viewer in terms talk shows and day-time 'stories.' Without their writers, these programs will be airing reruns for the time being. Most of the hosts of talk shows, like Jay Leno are supporting the writers on the picket lines. John Stewart is even paying the writers of his show and the Colbert Report for two weeks, should the strike last that long.
1 comment:
I'm freelancing for ABC during the strike. Everyone on the LOST island will be crushed by falling helicopters and then replaced with characters who carry on what may or may not appear to be an alternate Sports Night season 3 plotline. Sans electricity.
Post a Comment